Claims insights: hospital-based early career doctors

Complaints: outcomes for hospital-based early career doctors overall

Nearly all complaints against practitioners who were considered to have met the standard of care were dismissed.

Key points

• There is a low incidence of claims and complaints against hospital-based early career doctors in FY2020-21. 
• The most common issue in claims and complaints related to practitioner behaviour. 
• Diagnosis related issues were a frequent  source of allegations for residents (PGY2+).
• Procedural/surgical related issues were a significant source of allegations for registrars. 
• Nearly all (97%) regulatory complaints against hospital-based early career doctors deemed to have met the standard of care were dismissed.

The above retrospective review is of routinely collected and coded data. Our review is based on 857 regulatory complaints and compensation claims involving Avant members who are hospital-based early career doctors across Australia (interns, n=36; residents (PGY2+), n=418; registrars, n=403). All matters were closed over the five-year period from July 2016 to June 2021. In this analysis, hospital-based early career doctors included interns, resident medical officers (residents PGY2), senior resident medical officers (residents PGY3-5), hospital registrars and specialists in training. GP registrars were excluded from this sample.

Notes on the outcomes analysis

This analysis was conducted on regulatory complaints made against hospital-based early career doctors from July 2016 to June 2021. Only complaints that were risk assessed and with a known outcome were included.

The outcomes were classified based on the degree of severity for members. Shown below are some of the types of outcomes in each category.

• Dismissed – e.g. discontinued, no further action
• Low severity – e.g. counselled, caution, conciliation, resolution, fine
• Medium and high severity – e.g. reprimand, conditions, registration changes, suspension, cancellations
  1. A dismissal may have been granted despite a below standard of care assessment. This outcome would have considered the actions already taken by the member including risk management interventions made or education such that there is no future risk to the patient/claimant.
  2. In some cases, a practitioner who has met the requisite standard of care may be found to behave in a way that constitutes unprofessional conduct or have an impairment. This may require additional proceedings with a relevant panel, entity or responsible tribunal.

Glossary

• Claims refers to claims for money, compensation and civil claims.
• Complaints relates to formal complaints to regulators.
• Matters include claims, complaints, coronial cases and other matters such as employment disputes and Medicare.
• Employment disputes are matters where Avant defends members against complaints or supports members to resolve employment issues.

For medico-legal advice, please contact us here, or call 1800 128 268, 24/7 in emergencies.

For any queries on this analysis, please contact us at research@avant.org.au

Visit our Insights & Resources page for further educational content including webinars, eLearning courses, case studies, articles and factsheets.