Doctor in scrubs with stethoscope around his neck in consulting room

Tribunal finds GP’s prescribing drugs of dependence for patients with history of addiction constitutes professional misconduct

Sunday, 15 October 2023

Key messages from the case

Doctors caring for patients with drug dependency may find their professionalism compromised. Bowing to patient pressure to prescribe drugs of dependence without a proper assessment may breach your legal and professional obligations. It may also mean failing to provide appropriate care for a patient’s other physical and mental health issues.

Details of the decision

Prescribing drugs of dependence

Following an investigation by the regulator, Dr L admitted having inappropriately prescribed S4 and S8s including Panadeine Forte, MS Contin, Serepax, methadone, diazepam, Targin and naloxone to patients he knew or should have known had a history of drug dependence.

He had also failed to seek appropriate authorisation for prescribing.

In some cases Dr L had written a prescription for these medications without having a consultation with the patients. He also accepted he failed to take appropriate steps before prescribing including,

  • assessing the patient
  • making a diagnosis
  • appropriately assessing the risks of prescribing to patients with known drug-dependency, or considering alternatives to prescribing
  • formulating a management plan.

In some cases, he was aware of potential doctor-shopping but had failed to demonstrate he had taken appropriate steps to confirm whether the patients were doctor-shopping.

Standard of care

Dr L accepted that his prescribing amounted to a failure to provide appropriate care including failing to make an appropriate clinical assessment, and not attempting to address the patients’ mental health issues.

Record keeping

Dr L admitted he had failed to keep appropriate records documenting the clinical indications for prescribing, his assessment and his clinical decision-making. He had failed to document patients’ clinical history, investigations undertaken, assessments, information provided to patients, and treatment and management plans.


The tribunal concluded Dr L’s behaviour constituted professional misconduct.

Dr L, who was of retirement age, had surrendered his registration and retired from practice. He had also voluntarily completed education in opioid prescribing and medical record-keeping.

Dr L was reprimanded, his registration was cancelled and he was disqualified from reapplying for registration for nine months.

Dr L was ordered to pay the regulator’s legal costs of $7,500.

Key lessons

Have policies or procedures in place to help you maintain your professional judgement when facing patient pressure to prescribe drugs of dependence.

When prescribing drugs of dependence, take a history of any previous drug use and consider this in decision-making.

Be alert to drug-seeking and doctor shopping behaviour in patients when prescribing drugs of dependence. Register for access to prescription shopping and real-time prescription monitoring in your state/territory, and always check before prescribing.

Understand when authorisation is required for prescribing a drug of dependence and what other legal requirements for prescribing medications exist in your state or territory.

Only prescribe medications after a proper consultation and where therapeutically indicated.

If you are unwilling to prescribe drugs of dependence for any patient, say ‘no’ in a respectful and clear way so there is no room for misinterpretation or ambiguity. Give a reason for not prescribing. Consider non-pharmacological alternatives. Offer to refer the patient to a colleague or engage help from other specialists.

Always maintain clear, up-to-date medical records that include details of a patient’s clinical history, your clinical findings, investigations, assessments, information provided to the patient, medical details and treatment and management plan – in a form that can be understood by other health practitioners.

More information

For medico-legal advice, please contact us on or call 1800 128 268, 24/7 in emergencies.

Download case study


The case discussed in this publication is based on a real case. Certain information has been de-identified to preserve privacy and confidentiality. The information in this article does not constitute legal advice or other professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. It is intended only to provide a summary and general overview on matters of interest and it is not intended to be comprehensive. You should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of its content. 

Our CPD courses for Avant members

Tick off some CPD hours and learn more with our in-depth eLearning courses, free for Avant members. Our courses include education activities, reviewing performance and measuring outcomes. 

Learn now

Our collection on this topic

Explore more insights and resources about this topic, in different formats, from Avant and external resources. 

Review our collection

Need support?

Dealing with a medico-legal issue can be stressful. Find out how Avant and other organisations can help.

To Top